Storm Score 73 out of 100
Reviews 3 published
Outlets 3 publications
Top Outlet Gizmodo highest score
% Positive 100% acclaim+

Critics' Consensus

“Critics praise the polar loop as a solid, subscription‑free fitness band that competes with Whoop, yet they fault its limited sensor suite and less comprehensive health guidance, leaving it short of a true Whoop‑killer.”

Certified
Critically
Acclaimed
73 / 100
Tier Distribution 3 reviews total
0%
100%
0%
Universal Acclaim (90–100): 0 reviews
Critically Acclaimed (70–89): 3 reviews
Mixed Reception (<70): 0 reviews

Critical Assessment

What Critics Praise

  • Long battery life
  • Extremely comfortable
  • No distracting display
  • No yearly subscription
  • One-time purchase price
  • No additional fee

Points of Contention

  • Might be too little data
  • Rudimentary app
  • No GPS
  • Lacks skin temperature sensor
  • Fewer health features
  • Patchy activity recognition

Professional Reviews

3 reviews from 3 critics
80
Claire Maldarelli
Gizmodo

“The new subscription‑free fitness band is a solid competitor to Whoop, but with a big caveat.”

Acclaimed 4/5
70
Andrew Gebhart
PCMag

“The Loop is more limited than the Whoop 5.0, as it lacks sensors for skin temperature and blood oxygen levels, and doesn’t offer as much holistic advice or long-term health tracking, but it's certainly a compelling alternative when it comes to cost.”

Acclaimed 70/100
70
Andrew Williams
TechRadar

“but for now, this isn’t quite the Whoop-killer you may be hoping for.”

Acclaimed 3.5/5

Similar Products

More in Fitness Tracker

View all →